skip to Main Content
William Norman

Contact William

Email: wnorman@cwclaw.comPhone: 415-433-1900vCard: download

Bill Norman started practicing law in California after extensive experience as an officer in the U.S. Army, first as an infantry platoon leader on the DMZ and later as a trial attorney for both criminal prosecutions and their defense.  Then, after serving for many years as a trial partner at Bronson, Bronson & McKinnon (where he chaired the Real Estate Litigation Department), he joined Cooper, White & Cooper LLP in 1999.  He is a highly experienced business trial lawyer with emphasis in real property, wrongful termination, trade secret, professional liability, partnership/LLC disputes, probate litigation (including elder abuse and undue influence claims), and lender liability issues.  He has tried over 75 civil lawsuits to successful conclusions, the majority of them jury trials, with the result that he has been elected to the American Board of Trial Advocates.

At Cooper, White & Cooper, Mr. Norman chairs its Real Estate Solutions Group. He regularly posts articles on the Firm’s website, including, most recently, “When the Business Judgment Rule Clashes with Fiduciary Duty Principles: Recent ‘Lessons Learned’ from the Courtroom.”   He has spoken to a wide variety of professional groups, including the annual CEB seminar on Real Property Remedies, the annual California Bankruptcy Forum, the international LAW convention, PLI, the Annual IPA Commercial Roundtable Forum, several regional offices of JAMS judges, and the Securities Roundtable Forum.  He has appeared on national television to discuss constitutional issues and he has served as an expert witness on numerous litigation-related issues, including standards of care regarding trial strategy and the reasonableness of legal fees.

SOME RECENT EXAMPLES OF NOTABLE TRIAL RESULTS

  • Trial Testimony

Successfully testified in San Francisco Superior Court as an expert witness for the plaintiffs on a law firm’s failure to meet the standard of care in handling complex commercial litigation.  The issues included the standard of practice for developing alter ego claims, proper presentation to the Court of spoiliation of evidence claims, and the ethical limits on how far a lawyer can go in guiding experts on their testing procedures and reports.  The Superior Court repeatedly cited Mr. Norman’s “extremely strong and credible” testimony as the main basis for its award of damages and prejudgment interest exceeding $4.2 million. (2019)

  • Partnership Breaches of Fiduciary Duty

Following a hard-fought trial against a publicly traded steel company represented by a large international law firm, obtained a multi-million dollar Superior Court judgment in favor of a minority partner client for breaches of fiduciary duty by a 75% majority partner.  A seven figure sum was also awarded for attorneys’ fees and costs as prevailing party on issues such as self-dealing in respect to an improperly taken partnership business opportunity and  in respect to diverting income from the partnership to favor the majority partner’s parent corporation.  (2018)

  • Money Laundering, Alter Ego

In a trial involving an international money-laundering scam, obtained a multi-million dollar Superior Court judgment on behalf of a real estate purchaser client.  Both fraud and negligence were found against several perpetrators, including one who was specifically found to be the alter ego of an insolvent signatory to a contract with an attorneys’ fees clause.  Along with recovering all compensatory damages sought plus interest, attorneys’ fees, and experts’ costs, of particular interest was the successful determination that the defendants had aided and abetted a conspiracy to violate the provisions of Corporations Code § 17707.07.  That statute allows the tracing and recapture of sale proceeds from a real estate transaction to the principals of a seller LLC which has become insolvent due to excess profit distributions.  (2017-2018)

  • Trial Attorney Negligence

Testified in San Francisco Superior Court for three days as an expert witness on attorney standards for evaluating and trying civil jury trials.  Citing Mr. Norman’s extensive trial experience and credibility, the Court found that a large international law firm had fallen short of acceptable trial attorney standards and it ordered a fee refund of over $9M.  (2018)

  • Partnership Breaches of Fiduciary Duty

Following a month-long Superior Court trial, defeated a claim against our client, the founder of four elder care facilities, which was based on a theory that he had personally guaranteed his partners a multi-million dollar return irrespective of project success.  At trial, his partners described vivid recollections of key conversations with our client describing a written guarantee but under cross-examination it was revealed that they actually remembered nothing about the vague writing.  The trial result included our client obtaining ownership of their partnership interests plus hundreds of thousands of dollars in monetary recovery on his own claims against them for their breaches of fiduciary duty.  (2016-2017)

  • Elder Abuse And Partnership Fraud

Won a seven figure Superior Court judgment on behalf of a real estate investor client against his Russian national partner, for elder abuse and breaches of fiduciary duty.  The defendant partner had persuaded our client to enter into an oral partnership the terms of which called for her use of our client’s funds to purchase apartment complexes in California plus raw land in Arizona without him being on title.  She then proceeded to enter into an escrow for resale without notifying him, added other partners without his consent, and engaged in bank fraud using a partnership account.  (2015-2017)

  • Elder Abuse And Fraud

Obtained a payment of over $36M to our clients, four heirs of a steel magnate’s fortune, following prosecution of a probate court action against their step-mother which sought return of the father’s separate property assets on the contention that the step-mother had caused the clients’ Alzheimer’s-ridden father to make transfers to her personal account under conditions of undue influence and elder abuse.  (2014)

  • Bad Faith Claims

Represented the buyer of a prominent restaurant property in a lawsuit against the sellers and their real estate broker for bad faith and fraud.  After a highly successful settlement with the broker defendant, the case proceeded through a three-week jury trial against the sellers with a jury determination in the client’s favor of bad faith and intentional concealment by the sellers.  (2014)

  • Lehman Investment Self-Dealing

Successfully obtained a very substantial recovery for lender liability misconduct including fraud against the world’s second largest bank on behalf of a national pension fund client whose $100M portfolio had been significantly invested by the bank in Lehman bonds.  Evidence showed that the bank had bought Lehman bonds for the client’s account and had recommended holding them without disclosing that the bank itself was actually unloading Lehman positions in its own personal account just a few months before Lehman’s bankruptcy.  (2013)

  • Attorney Misconduct in Litigation Overcharges

Successful testimony as an expert witness before a San Francisco Superior Court jury on the unreasonableness of over $13M in attorneys’ fees charged by a large national law firm to its clients for a three-month long jury trial.  The law firm contended that the complex trade secret and international money laundering trial was litigated in four different states and several countries such that the fees were justified.  Mr. Norman’s expert testimony was cited repeatedly as a major basis for the determination that the law firm’s fees should be reduced by over $5.2M because of improper staffing, discovery abuses, and poor trial counsel leadership.  (2013)

  • Lender Liability

On behalf of a national bank client, successfully defeated a significant lender liability claim and obtained a $1.7M recovery for the client on a related cross-complaint against a commercial loan guarantor.

  • Triple Net Lease Fraud Claims

Successful defense of numerous triple net lease fraud cases set for separate jury trials in Seattle, in which the defendant clients were accused of failing to disclose overlapping common ownership of the tenants and the sellers, weaknesses of the financial condition of the lease guarantors, dual agency, and the decreased value of the space on the open market if the underlying restaurant businesses in various cities in Texas were to fail, as they later did.  (2012-2013)

  • Corporate Officer and Director Liability

In a trial featuring the $80M sale of an energy industry company, represented the president in claims against other stockholders for breach of fiduciary duty, contract violations, and unjust enrichment.  Our client obtained all relief requested plus attorneys’ fees as the party prevailing on issues that included alleged asbestos risk cover-ups, circumstances in which the transactional lawyers on both sides of the buyout gave advice to both sides of the deal, and the validity of certain EBITDA valuations.  The numerous complex legal questions included whether the time periods set forth in one contract for the exercise of certain stock purchase “put” rights could be changed without the consent of all signatories.  Our client argued successfully that they could be so changed because the contract generically referenced the “time periods” set forth in a second contract between different parties and that second contract contained a separate clause permitting a subsequent amendment.  (2012)

  • Law Firm Dissolution Fraud

Following a hard-fought trial, obtained an award valued at more than $30M for clients who had sued for partnership dissolution and breaches of duty.  Extensive cross-claims against our clients for their alleged breaches of fiduciary duty were defeated, an almost $900K in attorneys’ fees and costs were awarded to them as prevailing parties.  Some of the interesting issues at trial included whether partners’ fiduciary duties to each other are modified after a Notice of Dissolution in advance of a final wind-up, so as to permit solicitations of partnership employees and clients or to permit the forming of a competing business during the dissolution period.  (2012)

  • Bill Graham Estate Executor Misconduct

Obtained a judgment dismissing a complaint and recovered substantial prevailing party attorneys’ fees for a client who had served as Executor of rock promoter Bill Graham’s estate.  The client was sued by Graham’s heirs for an alleged secret diversion of intellectual property from the estate to a corporation in which the Executor was a significant shareholder.  The successful result was achieved with an anti-SLAPP motion in federal court.  (2011)

  • Real Estate Fraud

After a two-month long jury trial on breach of fiduciary duty and punitive damage claims, obtained a highly successful result for a national prominent real estate client.  (2011)

  • Breach Of License Agreement

On behalf of a nationally prominent, high-end restaurant client, sued a luxury hotel defendant for $8M and obtained a very substantial result on a case arising out of a breach of a License Agreement where the evidence showed defective Notices of Default as well as active interference with the client’s right to cure.  (2009-2010)

  • Real Estate Broker-Seller Fraud

Successful defense of a month-long jury trial in which a key issue was whether a buyer of commercial real estate property may sue his real estate broker if he himself was a licensed broker charged with due diligence responsibility.  (2010)

  • Theft of Partnership Opportunity

In a lengthy superior court trial, won a $7M judgment, plus $1M in attorneys’ fees for an individual plaintiff in a case involving the theft of a partnership opportunity by a defendant general partner in the context of a mortgage-backed security transaction.

  • Minority Partner Rights Violations

After a month-long trial, won a $7.5M award for a minority partner against its general partner in a cable TV investment where evidence showed extensive self-dealing by the general partner.

  • Commercial Real Estate Fraud

Obtained a $12M judgment for fraud on behalf of commercial real estate investor clients against their former LLC Managing Member and his affiliated general contractor entities where the evidence showed false representations as to matching capital contributions, extensive self-dealing, commingling of funds with other projects, phony land option payments, and undisclosed partnerships between the Managing Member and certain third party sellers.  (2009)

  • Owner’s Alleged Wrongful Real estate broker fraud

Successful defense, through a six-week trial, of a nationally prominent real estate brokerage firm for alleged intentional fraud, breaches of fiduciary duty, and violations of Business & Professions Code § 17200.  The case arose out of five triple net lease investments (retail gasoline stations) and the claims related to alleged misrepresentations of the income stream, financial strength of guarantors, and operator track records.  (2008)

  • Winery Owner Termination of Nationwide Manager

In a two-week trial, successfully defeated a $2.5M breach of contract and wrongful termination claim made by an East Coast alcoholic beverage distributor against a nationally prominent winery/movie producer client.

  • Overseas Letters of Credit

Obtained a defense judgment after trial for an international client in a case involving alleged misuse of overseas letters of credit by the client on a complex commercial transaction where over $50M in damages were claimed.

  • REITS and Construction Defects

Won a $1.3M award after trial for a national real estate investment trust client against the seller and builder of a large apartment complex with respect to construction defects, including multiple AAS issues.

  • Alter Ego

Successfully defended a California superior court lawsuit through trial against claims seeking an alter ego judgment against an individual client by piercing the corporate veil of his affiliated corporation and obtained substantial attorneys’ fees in favor of the individual client.

  • Partnership Fraud

Obtained a judgment in favor of our client after trial in a dispute between two partners arising out of extensive investments in Southern California commercial real property, with cross-claims for breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, conversion, accounting, contempt of court, and domestic violence.

In another matter, won a $400,000 judgment after trial for an individual client wrongfully accused of real estate partnership fraud.

  • Pipeline Owner Negligence and OSHA/Criminal Misconduct

Successfully defended over a three-year period the nation largest pipeline owner in 24 personal injury and wrongful death lawsuits, including cases involving five deaths and four serious burns arising out of a fire and explosion that occurred on a high pressure petroleum line in which failures to locate and mark the line and violations of California’s Underground Service Alert (“One Call”) statute were alleged.  DOT enforcement actions, OSHA citations, governmental entity immunities, complex indemnity issues, California State Fire Marshall investigations, and District Attorney charges were also involved.  Many co-defendants were convinced to contribute towards overall settlements in the range of $100M.  (2006-2009)

  • Real Estate Developer Fraud

Secured a highly successful result following trial in a breach of duty dispute between a prominent real estate developer client and one of its minority shareholders.

  • Restaurant Lease Disputes

Obtained a defense award after trial for a restaurant client accused of violating numerous covenants in its lease.

  • Underground Storage Tanks

Obtained a defense award in favor of a nationally prominent client in an arbitration involving non-disclosure of an underground storage tank.

Won a $400,000 judgment after trial for an individual client wrongfully accused of real estate partnership fraud.

Obtained a defense award in favor of a nationally prominent client in an arbitration involving non-disclosure of an underground storage tank.

Continuing successful litigation representation and counseling of parties to distressed real property development projects as triggered by the current credit crisis, including lenders, borrowers, guarantors, contractors and owners.  This includes a wide variety of strategic actions such as pursuing managers who have commingled or stolen funds, developing lender liability claims and defenses, initiating Chapter 11 bankruptcies to preserve negotiating flexibility (and defending against SARE motions to dismiss), asserting and defending claims on personal guaranties, managing internal investor relations, defending mechanics lien foreclosure actions, and negotiating restructuring packages with third party developers (Ongoing).

SOME RECENT EXAMPLES OF PUBLISHED APPELLATE SUCCESSES

  • Won a California Appellate case in a published opinion [Westra v. Marcus & Millichap, 129 Cal.App. 4th 759] establishing the right to arbitration by a non-signatory agent to a contract containing an arbitration clause.
  • Successful determination before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that land sale contracts promoted as passive investments were not securities for purposes of the application of federal securities laws. [De Luz Ranches v. Coldwell Banker, 608 F.2d 1297.]
  • Successful invalidation in the Court of Appeal of a client’s Confession of Judgment. [Efstratis v. First Northern Bank, 59 Cal.App.4th 667.]

SOME RECENT OTHER SUCCESSFUL REPRESENTATIONS

  • Successfully defended a nationally prominent winery in resolving claims of TCA contamination and associated product disparagement.
  • Continued representation and counseling of clients as to environmental litigation including issues arising out of CERCLA, nuisance, ultrahazardous liability and trespass causes of action.
  • Substantial ongoing counseling of general contractor clients in regard to AIA contracts, foreclosure and bankruptcy issues, delay claims, change orders, building damage claims for mediation, and upgrading ADR provisions.
  • Successfully defended attorneys in two separate complex cases involving alleged contempt of court.
  • Obtained a defense judgment for a nationally prominent freight forwarding company on a wrongful termination claim brought by the company’s former president.
  • Obtained an eight-figure settlement for a national real estate developer against the alter ego parent of a foreign-owned joint venture partner for breaching a financing commitment on a failed luxury hotel and golf course.
  • Obtained six figure judgments against alter ego defendants in two separate cases after piercing their corporate veils.
  • Successfully defeated, through a C.C.P. §425.16 Anti-SLAPP motion, numerous malicious prosecution and interference with contract claims made against an attorney client, and won a substantial award of attorneys fees for the client.
  • Won a $750,000 summary judgment in federal court for a national building management firm on a fidelity bond claim against an insurance company for a bad faith denial of coverage of claims arising when a top executive of the client in Los Angeles took kickbacks from third party vendors.
  • Successful defense of psychologists and clergymen in numerous lawsuits for alleged breaches of confidentiality.
  • Successfully defended and prosecuted numerous lawsuits for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty on the part of majority owners of corporations and limited liability companies with respect to their relationships to minority members or shareholders.
  • Achieved numerous highly successful results, including injunctive relief and a seven-figure recovery, in several major trade secret lawsuits on behalf of a national real estate broker against agents and managers who departed with customer lists and proprietary information.
  • Negotiated a $1.1-million settlement for a plaintiff lender in an action against its real estate developer and its contractors for construction defects in a large apartment complex.
  • Represented plaintiffs in a multimillion-dollar settlement arising out of deaths in the Loma Prieta earthquake caused by a commercial building’s lack of seismic safety.
  • Successfully defended a large real estate developer in a class action construction defect case in Contra Costa County.
  • Successfully defended a Bay Area-based REIT in a $12 million construction defect lawsuit for developer liability on a large peninsula condominium project, settling the case with a contribution equal to less than half of expected trial costs.
  • Continuous advice, counseling, and litigation defense of partnership disputes, including litigation and mediation of issues involving departing partners taking clients and files.
  • Successful defense of a client on a project delay claim arising out of construction of the Grand Coulee Dam.
  • Successful defense of numerous real estate developers in over 25 cases alleging construction defects, including foundations, roofing issues, hardboard siding, beetle-infested hardwood floors, and faulty jacks.
  • Numerous successful trials and arbitrations defending real estate brokers, attorneys, psychologists, clergymen, engineers, and appraisers against claims of professional negligence and fraud.
  • Successfully defended the project engineer on professional negligence claims arising out of construction of the Black Butte Dam.
  • Obtained through litigation a $1-million reduction in rent on behalf of an engineering company tenant on the grounds that the landlord’s 1927 building lacked seismic safety.
  • Successfully defended a REIT in a suit for breach of a written loan commitment agreement.
  • Successfully represented plaintiffs in several multimillion lawsuits for fraud in connection with mortgage conduits.
  • Won a summary judgment for a client seeking a critical prescriptive easement for its commercial property.

LITIGATION PHILOSOPHY

Mr. Norman’s litigation philosophy is to be aggressive in representing a client’s interests while continuing to look for creative and cost-effective solutions. As a professional mediator who successfully completed the national Academy of Attorney Mediators program, he understands that early resolution of disputes is preferable, though ADR efforts are best pursued after solid preparation and from positions of strength. Litigation budgets are a desirable way to address client expectations and to control legal costs. Clients should be kept closely advised in detail. All client inquiries should be responded to immediately, and certainly no later than the same business day.

PROFESSIONAL AND COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES

Mr. Norman has spoken widely to a variety of professional audiences, including Continuing Education of the Bar (1999 – present, panelist in CEB’s Real Property Remedies Seminar), the California Bankruptcy Forum, Lorman, and Practicing Law Institute seminars, law schools, trade associations, and state conventions. He has appeared on national television (ABC’s “20/20”) to discuss constitutional issues, and he has published numerous articles on a wide variety of current issues. These include articles appearing in California Lawyer, The Recorder, The Daily Journal,CPA Managing Partner Report, Alternatives, Pacific Builder, ABTL Report, Financial Planner Magazine, Realtor Magazine, Defense Research Institute Journal, American Agent & Broker, California Real Estate Journal, and Corporate Real Estate Executive.

PERSONAL

Born – Colorado Springs, Colorado
B.A. – Williams College
LL.B. – University of Virginia

Back To Top